Re: reply-to

From: Greg Madden <pabi@gci.net>
Date: Thu Dec 21 2006 - 07:33:22 AKST

On Thursday 21 December 2006 01:38, barsalou wrote:
> I don't really have a preference, but I have to say, that I thought it
> was working without the reply-to-all until recently...even if it always
> was reply-to-all always...the change doesn't bother me.
>
> Is there anyone with a serious objection to making this change? If so,
> please speak up and let us know why you feel the way you do so we can
> make a well reasoned choice.
>
> Mike T., Can you explain your past position on this?
>
> Mike B.

Seems like it depend on the application ussed for email. Kmail has a :
reply - goes to the entity sending the email, a reply to author, a
reply-to -all, and a reply to list option.

-- 
Greg Madden
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Thu Dec 21 07:33:35 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 21 2006 - 07:33:35 AKST