Subject: Re: Captive NTFS
From: Jamie Hushower (hushower@alaska-geeks.com)
Date: Thu Dec 04 2003 - 09:06:07 AKST
Ahhhh. Maybe the fact that the share was SMB changes everything...
Pardon me while I have a conversation with myself.
-Jamie
Jamie Hushower wrote:
> Its news to me that we can't! I used SuperRescue a few weeks ago to
> rescue files from a failing hard drive that wouldn't boot (from NTFS to
> NTFS over an SMB share). I assumed that Knoppix would provide that
> support as well. Or is the implication that NTFS is no longer
> "experimental" for writing? Or that NTFS permissions are respected by
> Linux? You can see I haven't done a lot of research.
>
> -Jamie
>
> Tim Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>I picked up a URL from a previous thread:
>>http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/
>>
>>Pretty interesting (and a very talented fellow)
>>and if you go up to the parent path
>>http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/
>>
>>There's some other interesting stuff. Looks like
>>we are in striking distance of a Knoppix that can
>>write ntfs files.
>>
>>tim
>>
>
>
-- Jamie Hushower Computer Consultant Rent-A-Geek 223-9136--------- To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Thu Dec 04 2003 - 09:03:16 AKST