Arthur Corliss wrote:
> :-P Don't get me started. I was happy with the stability of the kernels in
> the 2.0 & 2.2 days, angry in the 2.4 days (finally got some stability after
> 2.4.11, but still had to patch the kernel for XFS support), and beside
> myself in the 2.6 days. But, to get virtualization support on IBM POWER5
> platforms I've had to choice but to join the bleeding edge.
>
I thought linux is bullet proof :p
On a more serious note, 2.4 was decent, but there are a lot of
networking things in 2.6 that are WAY better. IPSEC on linux is no
longer lame as of 2.6.11. Anymore, I find a kernel that works and stick
with it as long as I can. It's kinda like upgrading a cisco router, you
start reading and trying IOS images until you find one that doesn't have
problems....
schu
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Mon Sep 11 15:22:52 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 11 2006 - 15:22:52 AKDT