On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Arthur Corliss wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Leif Sawyer wrote:
>
>> Interesting note: 2.0.1 ~ 4Mb, while 2.6.17.13 ~ 40Mb
>
> :-P Don't get me started. I was happy with the stability of the kernels in
> the 2.0 & 2.2 days, angry in the 2.4 days (finally got some stability after
> 2.4.11, but still had to patch the kernel for XFS support), and beside
> myself in the 2.6 days. But, to get virtualization support on IBM POWER5
> platforms I've had to choice but to join the bleeding edge.
In the 2.0/2.2 days I was playing a lot with Alphas, and 2.2 was much
better in that arena.
Mike
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Mon Sep 11 14:59:57 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 11 2006 - 14:59:57 AKDT