Re: killing 'dead' processes

From: Mac Mason <mac@cs.hmc.edu>
Date: Fri Aug 13 2004 - 13:39:22 AKDT

On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 08:47:53PM -0400, thomson@mail.afabco.com wrote:
> C'mon, this is linux=2E That can't be right=2E=2E=2E
What's a =2E control character?

And sure it can be right; there are such things at atomic operations,
and they can get stuck, just like everything else can. On the other
hand, I've found that it's not usually much of a problem; they tend to
work themselves out, and if they don't, you just start another one, and
ignore the hung one.

See also 'zombie process'.

    --Mac

-- 
Julian "Mac" Mason                            mac@cs.hmc.edu
Computer Science '06                          (909)-607-3129
Harvey Mudd College
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (SunOS)
iD8DBQFBHTUK1AphoTGXiN0RAo5OAJ4pEoxZzE7n/+rTAXVbM9uchbzolwCgiCLO
SNHsWQfQhXpbki8Eoni/fCM=
=LTPa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Fri Aug 13 13:38:43 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 13 2004 - 13:38:47 AKDT