Re: Injunction against SCO? Needs...


Subject: Re: Injunction against SCO? Needs...
From: Greg Jetter (greg@lazymountain.com)
Date: Sat Aug 09 2003 - 17:52:33 AKDT


On Friday August 8 2003 8:40 am, Rob Cermak wrote:
> Is there any way we can get a State of Alaska judge to pass an injuctio=
n
> on the SCO fee claim until the SCO-IBM lawsuit is settled?
>
> Anyone know a lawyer that could file such an injuction at the Alaska st=
ate
> level?
>
> The injuction should be two fold:
>
> (1) no fee payment until SCO-IBM lawsuit is settled.
> (2) if SCO is successful, and a fee payment is required,
> it should only be allowed at the original $600 level.
>
> We would be sitting in great pain if SCO came knocking at UAF looking
> for fee payment.
>
> Rob Cermak
> 907-474-7092
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.

Your reacting just the way SCO wants , The best thing to do is ignore the=
m =20
compleatly , if your realy worried , just swich to BSD or use a kerna=
l=20
version below 2.4 as there clame applies only to the 2.4 kernel as I=20
understand it. =20

Greg J

---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Sat Aug 09 2003 - 17:40:23 AKDT