RE: there is a new battlefield folks


Subject: RE: there is a new battlefield folks
From: William F. Fulton (fulton@gci.net)
Date: Fri Mar 22 2002 - 10:12:18 AKST


Whos going to the meeting tonight maybe we can get some of our leaders
together and we can draft an official position on this we as a group should
be doing something. This would also be a great time to talk about non-profit
status this isnt the first time things like this have happend and it wont be
the last. If we became a non-profit we could raise funds and also give
credibility to our actions just something to think about

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: aklug-bounce@aklug.org [mailto:aklug-bounce@aklug.org]On Behalf Of
William F. Fulton
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:59 AM
To: James Gibson; aklug@aklug.org
Subject: RE: there is a new battlefield folks

Ok heres more info Lisa Southerland is his legislative aid thats working
this issue for Sen. Stevens In DC her assistant is Candis Farell they can be
reached at (202) 224-3004 lets start burning up those phones people

-----Original Message-----
From: aklug-bounce@aklug.org [mailto:aklug-bounce@aklug.org]On Behalf Of
James Gibson
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:24 PM
To: aklug@aklug.org
Subject: RE: there is a new battlefield folks

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, James Zuelow wrote:
> > The text is out
> > http://www.politechbot.com/docs/cbdtpa/hollings.s2048.032102.html
> >
> All in all, this version seems a little skimpy. I wonder if it is the
> whole bill - it looks like the entire "Security" section of the SSSCA was
> either dropped, or else not included with this link.

get your scanned copies right here:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/cbdtpa

I'm simply steamed beyond words.

James Gibson



This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Fri Mar 22 2002 - 10:14:38 AKST