[aklug] Re: C++ reference books?

* Royce Williams <royce@tycho.org> [150529 18:36]:
> I've heard some good things about the Deitel & Deitel C++ book, but it's
> definitely a textbook. My D&D C book has a good index, but is not the
> full-blown reference that it sounds like you're looking for.
>
> I know zero about C++, but this might be an interesting resource that's
> closer to what you need:
>
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Standard-Library-Tutorial-Reference-2nd/dp/0321623215
> <http://www.amazon.com/Standard-Library-Tutorial-Reference-2nd/dp/0321623215/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1432951938&sr=8-1&keywords=c%2B%2B+standard+library>
>
> The 1999 version might also be fine, and it's going for quite cheap - like
> $5 shipped - so you could check it out without a lot of risk.
>
> This one also looks promising:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/C-Complete-Reference-Herbert-Schildt/dp/0072226803
>
> Royce
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Kurt Brendgard <brendgard@yahoo.com> wrote:

  After 10 years of coding in C, I started in C++. The code bloat
  was amazing. So was the slowdown in runtime. But I felt that OOP
  was in my future so I kept at it. Until I read an article in Linux
  Magazine back around 2000 that showed me how to do OOP in C.

  I went back to coding in C, using OOP approach.

  Since I was the sole programmer for the code bases I was working
  on, I think I made the right decision.

  C++ works better for teams IMHO. And for runtime and code bloat,
  we all know about the speed and data gain since 2000.

  Will Moore's Law kill C?

-- 
Tim 
http://www.akwebsoft.com, http://www.tj49.com
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.