* Jeremy Austin <jhaustin@gmail.com> [111026 14:18]:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Tim Johnson <tim@akwebsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > Product Dimensions: 7.7 x 1.4 x 7.7 inches ; 2.7 pounds
>
> OK, I'm stepping in now. Hope this isn't too off-topic.
>
> I too don't see the sweet spot the Mini is supposed to hit. [disclaimer:
sh...! I'm not having sex with my mini...
> former Mini owner, no problems] That is, *other than price*. The real
> competition for the Mini, as I see it, is not the iMac [for those who own
> good screen/s already], since an iMac = mini + more power + good LCD. And
> it's not mini PCs, because, well, Tim mentioned it. Few mini PCs, if any,
> have the build quality of the Mini, which must be taken into account when
> pricing.
I have no complaints with the display. I am using an LG with dvi..
> But. If small size is the goal, I don't see why one wouldn't buy a
> Macbook/Air? although in Tim's case, he needs the extra storage for running
> multiple OSes, and being limited by flash memory might put a cramp in it.
I didn't want a laptop. I got one. I wanted something with the
footprint that I described. I didn't want something that was
all-in-one either.
Also, when I first looked into getting a mini (prior to the 2011).
I was told to wait for the 2011, and I am hearing that there is a
performance boost over the previous.
Don't get hit with that pillow.
-- Tim tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebsoft dot com http://www.akwebsoft.com --------- To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.Received on Wed Oct 26 14:30:41 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 26 2011 - 14:30:41 AKDT