* Marc Grober <marc@interak.com> [110505 07:35]:
> As you can see, the doctrine is largely confined to kids and bears,
> undoubtedly because they have so much in common ;-)
As the father of 3 daughters, one of whom is a riding instructor
and horse trainer, I would respectfully offer that horses and
teenage girls have much in common.
The beforementioned daughter has her training business in Texas,
where State Law goes a long way towards indemnifying anyone
involved with rider or horse training or rodeos any just about
anything involving people and large animals. Really cuts down on
insurance expenses, so I understand.
> But my guess is that the FBI would push for doing something about the
> millions of infected PC's before targeting insecure wifi - lol. in any
> event,
But perhaps instead of something like the above mentioned Texas
approach being applied to unsecured wi-fi, the FBI could argue
from the lines of national security that an unsecured wi-fi is a
criminal act?
Could someone with a computer on a LAN that is not firewalled be
cited for leaving holes for someone to leapfrog into a skada
network and shut the grid down, or commit some other sort of
nuisance?
> the most obvious example of an attractive nuisance arising in
> Alaska is Sarah Palin. But,
Yikes! Does that mean that Sarah Palin could induce me to drive a
truck thru a convent? I know that she is an Evangelical, but
perhaps my Catholicism would be mitigate the influence?
I think I'm going to change my name to Lazarus Long and get the
hell off of the grid!
-- Tim tim at johnsons-web dot com or akwebsoft dot com http://www.akwebsoft.com --------- To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.Received on Thu May 5 11:27:10 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 05 2011 - 11:27:10 AKDT