[aklug] Re: RAID 6 vs. 5 w/ hot spare

From: Joshua J. Kugler <joshua@eeinternet.com>
Date: Sun Feb 13 2011 - 19:38:09 AKST

On Sunday 13 February 2011, Scott A. Johnson elucidated thus:
> Have a 8 drive RAID 5 with ~1.4TB capacity that has been full for a
> while and is getting old. Just ordered the hardware to migrate over
> to a 5-drive NAS with 2TB drives. I'll only use three of the drives
> for storage as the other two will either be parity in a RAID 6 or
> parity plus hot spare in a RAID 5. Anyone with suggestions, thoughts,
> or experiences on one configuration versus the other?

Have you taken into account the fact that a 2TB drive has more bits than
1/(error rate)? Thus, your chance of bit error while reading the
entire drive is > 1, thus (in theory) you could never successfully
rebuild your RAID array? Personally, I'd only use maximum capacities
of 500 to 750GB or so in my RAID drives.

j

-- 
Joshua Kugler
Part-Time System Admin/Programmer
http://www.eeinternet.com - Fairbanks, AK
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/  ID 0x73B13B6A
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Sun Feb 13 19:38:25 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 13 2011 - 19:38:25 AKST