Hmm... I read the article and I'm still sticking with ext4. Is ext3 safer? I guess... I'm not going to assume that data will be there after a crash. That's what backups are for.
We all have backups right?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan" <carbonfreeze@gmail.com>
To: aklug@aklug.org
Cc: "crowe robert" <crowe.robert@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 9:08:07 PM GMT -09:00 Alaska
Subject: [aklug] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 is out
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:49:53 -0800
Robert Crowe <crowe.robert@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sold! Sounds like we have a winner-will use that than. (Ubuntu Studio
> attained a half hour ago) Thanks fellas. B
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Damien Hull <damien@linuxninjas.tv>
> wrote:
>
> > Ext4 here... No problems... Wicked fast when doing an fsck. That's
> > on a slow laptop drive no less.
I suggest against using EXT4 on your /home. See:
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/19/1730247&art_pos=37
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
-- Damien Hull Linux Ninja Open Source Assassin http://linuxninjas.tv http://elite.linuxninjas.tv http://www.digital-overload.net --------- To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.Received on Mon Apr 27 07:49:12 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 27 2009 - 07:49:12 AKDT