RE: Er.... for Sendmail users......enough

Teh Schu writes:
> Adam Bultman wrote:
>> Re: schu lending a hand: I may cash in on that. Cyrus, if
>> it's not nfs safe, is a real bummer - since I need NFS-safeness.
>
> I honestly think you are better off to get rid of nfs. Most
> mail systems that are NFS safe trade off a lot of performance for
> it. Performance comes in small indexed binary files which
> generally don't work with NFS. Can't you setup your netapp
> to serve an iscsi target?
Oh, man. I <3 iSCSI via NetApp. It's very smooth.

I've even been thinking about compiling up the iSCSI client for my
linux box just to play around with it and stop doing NFS. But I
don't have a real good reason to burn cpu and figure out new
policy/permissions just so I could play. I suppose I could just
use a software initiator at home, too.

Oh, but back to the Sendmail/Postfix/Qmail debate...

Umm..

I use postfix for my mail servers. I probably don't study the config
enough to know what I'm doing wrong or doing right, but it works
in the capacity I need it to... except for the spam. and the
authentication. But that's just an eye-dee-ten-tee error, I'm sure.

-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
-- File: smime.p7s

---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Tue Aug 29 09:37:39 2006