Re: DSL vs. Cablemodem


Subject: Re: DSL vs. Cablemodem
From: Christopher Erickson (cerickson@gci.net)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 09:51:30 AKDT


Broadcast traffic is in a different COM21 ATM layer-2 VLAN and does not
count against your bandwidth utilization.

-Christopher Erickson

Jamie Hushower wrote:
>
> After a disappointing* stint with GCI cablemodem service, I am switching
> back to DSL. The memory of a painful PPPoE setup on Linux looms in my mind-
> granted, it has been a few years. In comparison, the cablemodem/DHCP setup
> was as simple as installing dhclient and pointing it to the appropriate
> interface. I have heard a lot of good things about Roaring Penguin and
> notice that it is included in Redhat's distribution. Can anyone recommend
> for or against dealing with Roaring Penguin or any other PPPoE facilitator
> versus using a Linksys router (which I already own) in front of my Linux
> firewall? I am impressed with the simplicity of Linksys' cablemodem/DSL
> router setup... Thanks.
>
> -Jamie
>
> * If you have cablemodem service, you come to expect portscans, various
> broadcast traffic, and windows SMB announcements to take up a fair portion
> of your monthly bandwidth allotment. Why should I pay for all of that
> traffic?
>
> _____________________________________
> Jamie Hushower
> Computer Consultant
> Rent-A-Geek
> 223-9136
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.

-- 
"My advice is free and worth every penny!"

Christopher Erickson Network Design Engineer 5432 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 529 Anchorage, AK 99508 N61° 11.710' W149° 46.723' www.data-plumber.com --------- To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 09:51:31 AKDT