[aklug] Re: netperf vs speedtest.net OFFTOPIC

fq_codel is decent, but has a severe cpu hit.

Dave Taht has been working with me and others to convince one vendor in
particular (Ubiquiti) to add support in more of their products. He was
able to get through to the edgerouter team, which, if you haven't played
with it, is a pretty awesome system. It's basically a debian system with
a modified vyatta cli on top of it, and all of the good things that
brings. They also added DPI in the newest version, but I'm not sure if
they are using the procera engine, IPOQUE's PACE engine, 6wind, etc...
they have to be getting those layer7 signatures from somewhere.

Anyway, if you get a chance to mess with "CAKE", it is the replacement
for fq_codel.

Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS

On 07/20/2015 11:32 AM, Jeremy Austin wrote:
> Hello ISPs,
>
> Is anyone running a netperf server in in AK?
>
> I've been investigating some of the newer queueing methods,
> specifically fq_codel, and ran across this Realtime Response Under
> Load test,
> https://flent.org/tests.html#the-realtime-response-under-load-rrul-test
>
> flent is a wrapper for netperf, previously known as netperf-wrapper.
>
> jermudgeon

-- 
Josh Reynolds :: CIO, SPITwSPOTS :: www.spitwspots.com
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.