[aklug] Fwd: RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons

Apologies to those also on NANOG, but per the recent discussion here on
IPv6 availability, here are some interesting numbers roughly
representing the scale of IPv6 routes carried by various providers.

By comparison, the current global IPv4 routing table is currently around
332,000 +/- routes.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:18:18 -0600
From: Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com>
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Organization: iName.com
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>

There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one
provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from
public route-view servers.
        AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%)
        Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%)
        GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%)
        Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%)
        Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%)
        TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%)
        Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Fields [mailto:Bryan@bryanfields.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 12:56 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons

On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:
> A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had
made
> a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
> Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take
multiple
> feeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.

Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes

:-D

-- 
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.