That link works better :-)
I didn't do a side by side comparison, but it looks pretty close at first g=
lance.
-- Jim Gribbin Linux user #179129 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Bradley" <weatchu@gmail.com> To: "Jim Gribbin" <jimgribbin@gmail.com> Cc: aklug@aklug.org Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:31:45 PM Subject: Re: [aklug] Re: Phoronix recently published an article regarding a= ~200 lines Linux Kernel patch This link may work: http://pastebin.com/sHRYRuAN Its basicly the same as the ubuntu directions at in this article: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/11/alternative-to-200-lines-kernel-patch.html On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Jim Gribbin <jimgribbin@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe I don't know how to use pastebin, but the link you posted doesn't s= eem to work. > > It starts to load that raw.php?[etc], then drops back to pastebin.com/ind= ex.html > > -- > Jim Gribbin > > Linux user #179129 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jon Bradley" <weatchu@gmail.com> > To: "Kevin Miller" <atftb2@alaska.net> > Cc: aklug@aklug.org > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 7:03:20 PM > Subject: [aklug] Re: Phoronix recently published an article regarding a ~= 200 lines Linux Kernel patch > > I just installed this hack on my Arch Netbook, using these intrustions: > > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=3D3DsHRYRuAN > > I've only been using it for about 20 minutes, but chromium is really > feeling faster, with videos, flash sites, google maps also seem faster > almost upto google-earth speeds. =C2=A0It might be a little plocibo, but > the hack is so small could just comment it out quickly to test it > against 'the norm' > > I think I'm gonna keep this one installed. > jon. > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Kevin Miller <atftb2@alaska.net> wrote: >> On 11/19/2010 02:02 PM, Jim Gribbin wrote: >>> And it seems to get more heated later in the discussion. >>> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/392 >>> >>> And there seems to be no clear winner. At least, not one I feel qualifi= e=3D > d to call. >>> >>> I think I.m going to go ahead and play around with it a little. >> >> It still leaves the question of what happens if you apply the kernel >> patch after applying Pottering's hack. =3DA0Do you have to roll it back >> first? =3DA0What happens if one doesn't? >> >> It's such a small and simple fix I wouldn't be surprised if we see it >> backported the next time <YOUR FAVORITE DISTO HERE> releases a kernel. >> But I'd hate to install the hack only to bork my system the next time I >> apply a kernel patch... >> >> ...Kevin >> -- >> Kevin Miller - http://www.alaska.net/~atftb >> Juneau, Alaska >> In a recent survey, 7 out of 10 hard drives preferred Linux >> Registered Linux User No: 307357, http://counter.li.org >> --------- >> To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> >> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body. >> >> > --------- > To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> > with 'unsubscribe' in the message body. > --------- > To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> > with 'unsubscribe' in the message body. > > --------- To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.Received on Sat Nov 20 22:48:55 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Nov 20 2010 - 22:48:55 AKST