Thomas Plastino Martin wrote, on 6/8/2010 3:28 PM:
> These are the traceroutes I get while using Clearwire. I tracerouted
> them in the order that Royce listed.
>
> This thread seems to be getting way OT to me.
The political part, or this network peering part? :-)
If the latter, I think that this is useful in the general geek sense,
but you'd be right if you're saying that it's not directly
Linux-related. But at least it's technical. :-) I'd be happy to kill
the thread if folks are thinking that it's too OT.
> http://tlms.pastebin.com/jBkG9hAy
Good info - that's what we needed; thanks, Thomas!
You're coming from GCI space, so I would expect these traceroutes, when
adjusted for wireless performance, to reflect GCI's peering.
All that we still need is a GCI-MTA test, then ... and preferably not
from a Clearwire node, as the wireless performance makes it hard to
discern big changes in the hops.
Royce
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Tue Jun 8 16:11:06 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 08 2010 - 16:11:06 AKDT