Quoting Richard Moore <dewey.moore@gmail.com>:
> //named.conf file
> http://richardm.pastebin.com/m66787154
> //named.conf.local
> http://richardm.pastebin.com/m6d9ede5e
>
> //named.conf.options
> http://richardm.pastebin.com/m27f08d90
>
> //rndc.conf
> http://richardm.pastebin.com/m133d751a
>
> //fndc.key
> http://richardm.pastebin.com/m622a113b
>
>
> Here are all the conf files. the keys are the same Is there any reason I
> keep getting an incorrect key message rndc and bind9 are both version 9.3.=
4
>
Richard,
Does this configuration work without the key stuff? I'd try getting a =20
simple setup working first, then head into using keys.
I'm not too familiar with this particular setup, but also wondered if =20
there was more information in the logs.
Additionally, you might get better info if you ran the named command =20
by hand instead of using the service start method. Just until you =20
finish testing.
Mike B.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Sun Dec 21 19:55:54 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 21 2008 - 19:55:54 AKST