Re: sendmail gripe

From: Royce Williams <royce@alaska.net>
Date: Sun Nov 26 2006 - 22:43:01 AKST

Well, my point wasn't about poor performance, just about obscurity of
configuration. Though one can certainly beget the other. :)

Adam Bultman wrote, on 11/26/2006 6:54 PM:
> Precisely why, about a week and change ago, I (with the help of a
> coworker) ripped out four sendmail servers and replaced them with ONE
> postfix server.
>
> I love it! Now the only problem is, now that the MTA isn't the
> bottleneck, I have to worry about bottlenecks elsewhere. For example, "Can
> the LDAP servers handle the traffic?"
>
> Adam
>
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Royce Williams wrote:
>
>> You know, I've been a sendmail proponent for years ... but I just
>> tried to imagine that I was a newcomer to sendmail while reading this:
>>
>> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/masquerading_relaying.html
>>
>>
>> It's easy to see why sendmail has a bad rep. Clear as mud.

---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Sun Nov 26 22:43:33 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 26 2006 - 22:43:33 AKST