The effect of using ssh vs rlogin
For the following experiment, a directory listing (the ls
command) was requested remotely, and the data packets were
'sniffed' from the network using the ethereal network utility:
The actual text received at the console was:
Desktop dhcpd.conf host.conf hosts
httpd ircd-2.10.3-1.i386.rpm ircd.conf
named named.conf outgoing ssh
The packets from the rlogin connection (with colour control
characters removed) contained:
Desktop dhcpd.conf host.conf hosts
httpd ircd-2.10.3-1.i3 86.rpm ircd.conf
named named.conf outgoing
The packets from the ssh connection contained:
.@Ã.Â¥!..¤ÂlJ..E..d.o@.@..¾À¨B.ˬB....4.
¶...jQs.)à ..........×..."Ù..ÚÃÓÆ.½O...@.ìõ.
..z.@ýÂ+%..h3ËjýwT. "¢Ûý.Cã..{
http://www.fraw.org.uk/cltc/documentation/cltc-doc-05.html
I guess the best thing to do is your own test. Setup two boxes, set
Ethereal to sniff the traffic and compare your results.
TJ
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 14:48, Thomison, Lee wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> I need a brief 'authoritative' discussion explaining in simple terms
> that a manager can understand why rcmd, rlogin, rsh, etc is bad and
> ssh/scp is good, even on a 'trusted' network. =20
>
> Anybody got any quick links to such? My googling has brought back
> results all over everywhere, but not brief and succinct on this subject.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Lee
>
>
>
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
> with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
>
---------
To unsubscribe, send email to <aklug-request@aklug.org>
with 'unsubscribe' in the message body.
Received on Thu Jun 17 15:21:34 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:21:36 AKDT